The following articles give us a frightening picture of what Progressives are trying to force upon us and all the nations of the world.  Progressivism is the enemy; we must understand it if we are to combat it effectively. 

Never forget that Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Vladimir Lenin, Josef Stalin, Mao-Tse-Tung, Idi Amin, Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and many others are all dyed-in-the-wool Progressives.

Here is the list of the articles on this page:

  1. Robert F Kennedy Jr. Exposes Bill Gates’ Vaccine Dictatorship Plan – Cites Gates’ Twisted ‘Messiah Complex’
  1. United Nations Wants 10 Percent of World’s Income to Fight COVID-19
  1. Is This How Capitalism Dies?
  1. RIP, U. S. Constitution: Our New “Pandemic Surveillance State”

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Exposes Bill Gates‘ Vaccine Dictatorship Plan – Cites Gates’ Twisted ‘Messiah Complex’

Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. is an American environmental attorney, author, and opponent of vaccination. Kennedy is a son of Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of former president John F. Kennedy. He is the president of the board of Waterkeeper Alliance, a non-profit environmental group that he helped found in 1999.

From #RobertFKennedyJr‘s Instagram post today, April 9th, 2020:

#Vaccines, for #BillGates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including #Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy—the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism.

Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans.

Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.

In 2014, the #GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.

During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers”

Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philantropic practices as “ruthless” and “immoral”.

In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign.

Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested.

After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.

Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.

A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP is killing more African than the disease it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children.

Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually.

Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development.

They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe.

In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.
In this recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.

United Nations Wants 10 Percent of World’s Income to Fight COVID-19

Written by  James Murphy

Friday, 03 April 2020

Avowed socialist and United Nations Secretary General António Guterres has announced the creation of a global fund meant to address the coronavirus pandemic. He is asking for all nations to contribute the equivalent of 10 percent of all global GDP to fund a gigantic “human-centered, innovative and coordinated stimulus package,” which would be administered by a global authority, presumably the UN itself.

“A large-scale, coordinated and comprehensive multilateral response amounting to at least 10 per cent of global GDP is needed now more than ever. This crisis is truly global. It is in everyone’s interest to ensure that developing countries have the best chance of managing this crisis, or COVID-19 will risk becoming a long-lasting brake on economic recovery,” the UN report states.

“The new coronavirus disease is attacking societies at their core, claiming lives and people’s livelihoods,” Guterres said.

The plan — entitled Shared Responsibility, Global Solidarity: Responding to the socio-economic impacts of COVID-19 — would entrust the UN (or another globalist entity yet to be named) with approximately $8.7 trillion, which it would supposedly use to fight and eradicate the coronavirus and address other problems that have resulted from the virus.

The UN’s current budget is approximately $3 billion. The $8.7 trillion would be 2,900 times greater than its current budget.

The plan calls for a massive global stimulus in order to “restore confidence in the future.”

“The global nature of the economic shock we are facing, with simultaneous collapses in both supply and demand, calls for the first truly global fiscal stimulus in history,” the plan states.

Needless to say, it also calls for a massive redistribution of the planet’s wealth.

“To be effective, the stimulus package will need to focus on direct and targeted transfer of resources to the most vulnerable households and scaling up health emergency preparedness, social protection, tax abatement, low interest rates, access to credit, insurance and wage support schemes. Support must be provided to countries that lack capacity to implement these measures.”

Among the measures in the plan is to give approximately $100 billion to the World Health Organization, whose director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, was complicit in the spread of the virus by continually repeating Communist Chinese talking points, including the farcical claim in January that COVID-19 was not transmissible to humans.

Money from the fund will also be used to pay specific “attention to continued delivery of sexual reproductive health services, such as access to contraceptives without prescription during the crisis.” As “reproductive health services” is a globalist euphemism for abortion, the folks at Planned Parenthood should be happy.

To Guterres, the Chinese virus represents a turning point in human history and a chance to truly implement the UN’s 2030 Agenda and also put some teeth in the Paris Climate Accord of 2015.

“And when we get past this crisis, we will face a choice — go back to the world we knew before or deal decisively with those issues that make us all unnecessarily vulnerable to this and future crises. Everything we do during and after this crisis must be with a strong focus on building more equal and inclusive societies that are more resilient in the face of pandemics, climate change, and the many other challenges we face,” the plan states.

“We already know what we need to do. It is laid out in the global road map for the future — the 2030 Agenda, the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.”

The UN is not the only entity to take an interest in a globalist response to the coronavirus. The World Economic Forum has presented a strategic intelligence overview of the COVID-19 that is so layered, so intricate, and so complex that it is hard to believe it could have been created in the scant weeks since the pandemic was declared.

An interactive graph details COVID-19’s impact on financial markets, travel, trade, global workforces, and the various healthcare issues such as vaccinations and halting the spread of the disease.

It’s almost as if these plans preexisted the Chinese virus — as if the plans were waiting for the just the right crisis in order to be unveiled.

Guterres and the UN are asking for the entire solar system, perhaps in hopes of being granted the moon. We have to be vigilant and make certain that they are not granted that moon or even a small asteroid to rule over.

The best way to remove the criminal influence of the UN is to remove the United States from its membership roll.

James Murphy is a freelance journalist who writes on a variety of subjects, with a primary focus on the ongoing anthropogenic climate-change hoax and cultural issues. He can be reached at

Is This How Capitalism Dies?

By Adam English
Written Apr. 14, 2020

Is this how capitalism dies? Through decrees from what once were the ivory towers of capitalism, no less?

The Fed is now up to $6 trillion of liquidity, or free money in the sense that it is taking over the role of large banks at 0% interest.

Go global and we're approaching $20 trillion of central bank pledges and action.

None of the questions that tempered the start of QE are being raised.

There is virtually no one talking about moral hazard. What does it mean for our society that government is pushing so far into what was — and may never be again — the private sector? No one will bother answering.

There is no one standing in the way of the largest transfer of wealth in history. The firewalls built into the system are being torn down, and the free markets are dying with barely a whimper.

Even Deutsche Bank, undoubtedly a major beneficiary, seems concerned about where this is going.

George Saravelos, global head of Deutsche Bank's foreign exchange research, just wrote in a report entitled “The end of the free market: impact on currencies and beyond” that:

"In a matter of weeks, policymakers have become a backstop for private-sector credit markets. At the extreme, central banks could become permanent command economy agents administering equity and credit prices, aggressively subduing financial shocks. It would be a bi-polar world of financial repression with high real economy volatility but very low financial volatility. A 'zombie' market'."

The Fed's most recent announcement — $2.3 trillion in greatly expanded funding — goes as far as dipping into the junk bond market through buying up ETF shares.

A free market this is not. There is no version of capitalism that can divorce risk from profits. There is no version of this that forces society to shoulder the burden while a select few capture the profits.

As Mati Greenspan, founder of analysis and advisory firm Quantum Economics, told Forbes recently:

"What we're witnessing here is nothing less than the death of capitalism and birth of something new. It's quite fascinating, really.”

Quite fascinating in the sense that it is hard to look away from your house burning, yes. He continued:

"By offering to buy an 'unlimited' amount of assets from the market the Fed is basically saying that they'd rather nationalize the markets than see prices drop. What started out a decade ago as an experiment in monetary policy now has us witnessing the transition to a new economic system."

That really is what we're seeing isn't it? A new economic system.

The new one will have no functional independence. Traders and investors will have to primarily worry about what the Fed unilaterally decides to do to the economy.

We will have to worry about which companies will be winners and losers. Which are worthy of protection from the king. A court of aristocrats and princes constantly jockeying for favor and patronage.

The grand experiment that is QE is being ramped up to the point where we truly are in uncharted territory with an unrestrained Fed.

This will be the beginning of a new economic system if there is no one in power to keep it in check. Trump didn't. Biden certainly won't. Congress long since abdicated the true power of the purse to focus on their own reelection war chests.

This may be unprecedented but it isn't unparalleled. History is rife with examples of what happens when a free market is captured and bled dry.

An unconstrained monetary printing press has always ended one way.

Times of grand economic transition always bring on intense periods of uncertainty and profound loss for those not protected by the de facto rulers.


RIP, U. S. Constitution: Our New “Pandemic Surveillance State”

Byron King, Managing Editor, Whiskey & Gunpowder

While most Americans are unafflicted by coronavirus, the Constitution — certainly, the Bill of Rights — is ready for a trip to the morgue.

You may not (yet) fully appreciate the tightening grip of government. After all, you’re probably at home. Perhaps you work remotely, or you keep to yourself and do your thing. All while you await whatever comes next. The hard hand of the state has not tapped you on the shoulder.

When you venture out, however, you’ll soon detect that many traditional American freedoms are suspended. We’ll see how many of those “freedoms” come back in the weeks and months to come as the biologic problem fades and power-politics begins to overwhelm.

Let’s dig into this…

Start with the fact that you’re at home, per government order. Perhaps you can go outside for a walk or exercise, or to do yard work or buy groceries. Still, in a legal sense, it’s mass house arrest. No due process. You committed no crime. You did nothing wrong. But you must stay at home because there’s a medical issue that has prompted “disaster” orders in all 50 states.

Things might be relatively laid back where you are. If so, good for you. You’re lucky. But across the country, there are places with tight restrictions, curfews and enforcement patrols by police. In other words, it’s medical martial law. Ask yourself, is this normal in America? Has anything like this happened across the republic in the past… oh… 236 years?

“It’s the virus,” they say. And medically, that’s a valid point. Let’s respect the math and science here. We’re confronting a nasty, infectious disease.

In fact, due to the lockdown of the past month, it appears that the U.S.  will keep overall virus deaths under 60,000 by the end of July.  Had there been no lockdown, statistics indicate there would have been over 2 million virus deaths by July.

So yes, every day of lockdown, and of enforced “social distancing,” has been important for keeping more people alive.

Meanwhile, you’re still homebound per government order. As a matter of law, your state governor locked you down, not President Trump. And you’re supposed to stay at home until told otherwise by… by whom? By the government, of course.

Don’t worry, the talking heads and spokespeople promise. Sooner or later you’ll be liberated. In one way or another, you’ll get your walking papers.

Perhaps parole will come from your governor. Or maybe President Trump will issue a national declaration, instructing governors what to do.

Actually, those two possibilities have moved an unsettled legal issue to the top of the current debate. Exactly who has “power” to set the nation free? And American politics being what it is, right away we have a Constitutional matter of state versus federal. Uh-oh.

But let’s stick to the immediate point, which is that in almost every part of the country people are not supposed to go out except for very specific reasons.  We are living under a new form of feudalism, as I discussed recently.

You can leave your home for food or health care. And you can go to work — but just to work, mind you! — if you hold a job that your governor has labeled an “essential” part of the economy.

Again, I get it. The idea is to promote self-isolation. Restrict public contact. Lower the risk of people catching the bug. Break the chain of transmission for coronavirus.

But it strikes me that some of our political bosses — definitely some governors — seem to enjoy their newfound power of control way too much.

Just as the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

Consider the governor of Michigan, Gretchen Whitmer. She recently restricted what so-called “essential” businesses like grocery stores can sell. As she put it,: “If you’re not buying food, medicine or other essential items, you should not be going to the store.” 

Whitmer ordered big-box retailers like Walmart and Target to shutter entire sections of their stores. In effect, the governor has barred customers from purchasing “non-essential” items such as auto parts, paint, hammers and nails, even gardening supplies down to seeds.

In Michigan, gardening ist verboten!

This draconian policy, according to the governor, is intended to limit unnecessary foot traffic in public spaces exempt from the state-wide shutdown.

But wait! Not all foot traffic is unnecessary. As the Detroit Free Press noted, “In-store purchases of Michigan Lottery tickets are still permitted.”

Lottery, yes. But buying a can of paint or a bag of seeds is a no-no. And so is buying a U.S. flag in Michigan. Off limits… Seriously.

Michigan Costco store. “Caution,” because flags are off limits.

Clearly, Whitmer has an odd set of priorities. She’s fine with lottery tickets, likely because Michigan needs the money. But people are barred from buying seeds — meaning they can’t plant a garden during this so-called “war” we’re waging. Let alone purchase a U.S. flag, representing the very political system that gives these politicians such power.

If you are a Michigander and don’t like what’s happening, I suppose you could take the governor to court. But wait… most courts across the U.S. are closed too, per the virus. (More to come on that topic in a future issue!)

The national lockdown, and associated government control, reflects a dangerous a new political ethic taking hold in the U.S.  It’s part of a long-term trend. Indeed, it’s no stretch to argue that the U.S. has long been moving towards a “post-Constitution” form of governance.

For example, Congress long ago ditched any semblance of an entity that can act only pursuant to “enumerated powers” of the Constitution, Article I, Section 8. And the “executive power” of Article II has long trended towards what has been termed an “Imperial Presidency.” Meanwhile, Article III judges — from district courts to Supreme Court — have long been rewriting basic terms of the Constitution to mean whatever the politics of the day demands.

Looking ahead, it appears that from local to state to federal levels, we’re experiencing the bow wave of a “monitor-and-control” system, coming into effect under the guise of public safety, all because of an invisible virus. This looming new system includes extensive control of the economy by government, via diktats over what is “essential” or not.

Long ago, Confucius noted that it’s important to call things by their correct names. Okay… We’re staring down the barrel of a “pandemic surveillance state.”

Technology has brought us to the point where every American can now be tracked, if by nothing else but mobile phones. The justification for tracking is that if you encounter anyone who later is found to have coronavirus, all parties can be “alerted” and referred to quarantine. Whew! Dodge that viral bullet, eh?  

Apparently, we’re not supposed to worry about this loss of privacy and freedom of movement. We’re not supposed to worry about this loss of ability to work and earn a living under government lockdown. Not supposed to worry about the prospect of “medical apartheid.”

The heck with that old-fashioned Constitution. After all, everything will be fine, right? It’s all going to be overseen by a new species of bureaucrat; an enlightened "expert" who knows about public health. It’ll be good for you… right?

While it’s all coming into play, most courts are closed just now. How reassuring. 

Maybe we should take comfort in the thought that even the devil enjoys a good laugh now and again. Because as we walk through this dark door into the surveillance future, some things are just plain ridiculous.

For example, in the name of preventing the spread of virus, an average citizen can now be arrested just for swimming in the ocean, like this paddle boarder who was recently busted in Malibu. (Truly, I can’t make this up.)

Maritime police arrest man for paddle boarding. Photo by LA County Sheriff Office.

Let’s sum it up… You’re likely stuck at home. If you leave, there’s no “right of assembly” because of the virus lockdown. Protests are “not essential,” per police who made a recent bust in North Carolina.

Courts are closed. Churches are closed. All this while most businesses are closed unless deemed “essential” by government authorities.

Right now, your traditional American liberties are gone. You just don’t know it because you’re under lockdown at home. And looking ahead, we have yet to see any firm guidelines for reopening not just the economy, but the Bill of Rights.

Preliminary forecasts from a variety of think tanks predict something like a “rolling” lift of the lockdown over 18 to 24 months. But even that has the caveat of intermittent periods back in lockdown, depending on new virus breakouts. Try planning your life around that…   

Along the way, our government officials will surely pat themselves on the back for all their brave actions that lowered mortality. We’ll be told ad nauseam how the end justified the means.

Sad to say, we’ll likely see more government controls in the months and years to come. Heck, lockdowns may become the new “norm,” even for the seasonal flu. 

Meanwhile, RIP, U.S. Constitution, 1789–2020.